A lifetime ban on gay and bisexual men from giving blood is under review, following calls from campaigners that the policy is unfair and misplaced. So which groups are prevented from donating on grounds of sexual behaviour?

The public is often being urged to give blood, to help those that need it, but the adverts are not directed at those deemed too high-risk to donate.

Blood services expect a shortfall in supply this winter
People are banned from giving blood for a variety of health reasons such as having had a blood transfusion after 1980 or having a family member with CJD. But rules which govern giving blood simply because of who you have sex with are not universally accepted by those who are banned.

A man is prevented from giving blood if he has ever had sex with another man, even if that happened decades ago and he has recently tested negative for sexually transmitted diseases like HIV.

A woman who once worked as a prostitute is also banned for life from donating, while anyone who has had sex with anyone who has been sexually active in parts of the world with high HIV rates, like sub-Saharan Africa, cannot donate for 12 months.

A review is under way to look again at these rules. The government's advisory committee on the safety of blood, tissues and organs (SaBTO) is holding a public consultation meeting in London as part of that process.
THE ANSWER According to those rules, the following groups are among those that have a lifetime ban on giving blood: a man who has had sex with another man (if you're a female) WHAT ARE THE RULES ABROAD?
Although all blood is screened, a small number of infected donations may be missed because there is a period of time between getting the infection and the test showing a positive result, its guidelines say.

Condoms reduce the risk of infection but don't eliminate it, they say, and men who have sex with men account for 63% of HIV diagnoses where the infection was likely to have been acquired in the UK. The risk of HIV-infected blood entering the blood supply would increase five-fold if the ban was lifted.

WHO, WHAT, WHY?

A regular part of the BBC News Magazine, Who, What, Why? aims to answer some of the questions behind the headlines

But gay rights campaigner Peter Tatchell says a government that opposes homophobic discrimination cannot possibly uphold the ban.

"It is based on the stererotyped, irrational, bigoted and unscientific assumption that any man who has had oral or anal sex with another man - even just once 40 years ago with a condom - is high risk for HIV. This is nonsense.

"The truth is that most gay and bisexual men do not have HIV and will never have HIV. Their blood is safe."

A spokesman for the Department of Health said the committee would publish its findings in 2010.